Re: why are there no traffic cammeras in the US?


"Matthew Russotto" <russotto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:I-idnVQR7aTRVCvenZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <t5jtf.39093$dO2.13040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Frank Puck <junk18843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>Yes -- the same problem is true for other countries using such cameras,
>>but they got around this problem by claiming that the owner of a car must
>>know who was driving his car at any given time
>>and if he doesn't, he will get charged by default -- his problem.
>>Why can't the so technological advanced US do the same?
>
> Because the problem is judicial retardation in those other countries,
> not technological retardation in the US. But don't worry, the US is
> heading down the same shithole; soon you'll be in paradise.


I think you and other people arguing like that
are just scared to be caught and not having anymore the right for some
"minor" traffic violations.
I agree that this also applies to me -- in a sense that it would be easier
to catch me speeding on the highway
-- I'm not speeding inside towns.
But I strongly favor that laws are obeyed -- maybe people come to there
senses and allow higher speeds on highways
-- as soon as they cannot do 80mil/hour anymore on a 65mil/hour highway.



.

Quantcast