Re: Why you should never buy a car without a tachometer
- From: "Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:53:11 -0400
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 todd_wasson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> By the way, the link you posted for your source of information did not
> work (probably too long and it got abbreviated when looking here through
> Google). Could you please post it on two lines or with a space half way
> in between so I can copy/paste it together and view the site?
Or, much better and less cumbersome, make the long URL into a short one
before posting it, by visiting www.tinyurl.com .
.
- References:
- Re: Why you should never buy a car without a tachometer
- From: John S.
- Re: Why you should never buy a car without a tachometer
- From: John S.
- Re: Why you should never buy a car without a tachometer
- From: Ted B.
- Re: Why you should never buy a car without a tachometer
- From: todd_wasson
- Re: Why you should never buy a car without a tachometer
- Prev by Date: Re: Why you should never buy a car without a tachometer
- Next by Date: Re: A modest fuel saving proposal: no more than 3000 RPM
- Previous by thread: Re: Why you should never buy a car without a tachometer
- Next by thread: Re: Why you should never buy a car without a tachometer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|