Re: Fireworks, Kids, and the Angry Driver
- From: "Harry K" <turnkey4099@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jul 2005 06:13:15 -0700
Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:49:38 GMT, DYM <dymnews@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>> But, once she's fought him off and his is running away, she does not
> >>> have the right to shoot him in the back and kill him.
> >>
> >> Oh yes she does. She has no guarantee that he will not make another
> >> attempt.
> >>
> >
> >And there is no garantee that he will. When the imminent threat is gone,
> >then it is no longer self defense.
>
> No court in the country would convict a rape victim for killing her
> assailant.
Take a strain Scot, your replies are getting further away from reality
each time.
Harry K
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fireworks, Kids, and the Angry Driver
- From: Scott en Aztlán
- Re: Fireworks, Kids, and the Angry Driver
- References:
- Re: Fireworks, Kids, and the Angry Driver
- From: DYM
- Re: Fireworks, Kids, and the Angry Driver
- From: Scott en Aztlán
- Re: Fireworks, Kids, and the Angry Driver
- Prev by Date: Re: British traffic signal lights
- Next by Date: Re: Bone head of the day
- Previous by thread: Re: Fireworks, Kids, and the Angry Driver
- Next by thread: Re: Fireworks, Kids, and the Angry Driver
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|