Re: Headphone Amplifier
- From: John Byrns <byrnsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 13:35:45 -0500
In article <7f8j24tbsh7grb75t8jpiomohmfo0hvhn2@xxxxxxx>,
flipper <flipper@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 08:22:52 -0500, John Byrns <byrnsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article <kk4i24t13io43j65n6jgmbjnpbr7juna56@xxxxxxx>,
flipper <flipper@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Btw, the OTL doesn't 'require' the 120 ohm resistor and it works just
fine as a 'low impedance' output.
You could just remove the 120 ohm, and then adjust the FB resistor for
the changed Vo, but there's also a nice trick can be played. Instead
of the FB R and blocking cap. as shown, put a 12ohm under the existing
Rk on V2A and take the headphone return to that junction. That
eliminates the DC blocking cap.
If I am following your description of this mod correctly, doesn't that
convert the negative feedback from voltage feedback to current feedback,
Yep
with the expected effect on source impedance?
Yes, but then a moving coil device is actually current driven so I'm
not sure what the 'net effect' would be.
The common "dynamic" loudspeaker is also a moving coil device and people
seem to feel they need to be driven from a voltage source. They talk of
"damping factor" and such. Can I assume that "damping" isn't a factor
with headphones, at least if they are driven from a 120 Ohm source?
Regards,
John Byrns
--
Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/
.
- References:
- Re: Headphone Amplifier
- From: Ian Iveson
- Re: Headphone Amplifier
- From: John Byrns
- Re: Headphone Amplifier
- Prev by Date: Re: test.
- Next by Date: Re: New 91A amp
- Previous by thread: Re: Headphone Amplifier
- Next by thread: Re: Headphone Amplifier
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|