Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- From: Peter Wieck <pfjw@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 22, 10:24 am, John Byrns <byr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
Correct, but the parallel connected lamps in your house are feed from
what is essentially a constant voltage source, not a constant current
source. If you house hold power was supplied by a constant current
source, each time you turned on another lamp the ones that were already
on would get dimmer, and if you had only one lamp on it probably
wouldn't last very long before burning out.
Um - let's make sure I understand this correctly - current is limited
by the fuse on each individual leg. *BUT* the amount of current
relative to the individual devices is unlimited, the fuse being the
actual controlling factor? That makes more sense - But if the filament
winding is sufficiently robust (and it should be in a well-designed
transformer), would this not be essentially the same condition - the
tube filament (heater) becoming the de-facto fuse?
Now, something that would exceed the current capacity of a transformer
winding sufficiently to cause individual tubes to behave differently
based on differents in filament draw (but still within "normal"
operating specifications for each tube) should be a remarkably rare
condition - again assuming a properly designed transformer?
Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- From: John Byrns
- Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- References:
- Wot? No tube mixer??
- From: Iain Churches
- Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- From: Iain Churches
- Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- From: John Byrns
- Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- From: Peter Wieck
- Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- From: John Byrns
- Wot? No tube mixer??
- Prev by Date: Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- Next by Date: Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- Previous by thread: Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- Next by thread: Re: Wot? No tube mixer??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|