Re: Brook amplifiers, sliding bias.
- From: Engineer <junk2007@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 28, 9:31 pm, Patrick Turner <i...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Googling Brook amps brought up
http://www.tubecad.com/2007/12/blog0128.htm
Food for thoughts.
Patrick Turner.
Certainly is (I've saved the .pdf for future study.) But I'm
wondering about the benefit if the signal source amplitude is truly
random. As I understand it, there is a roughly 6 Hz lag on the new
bias settings (for good reason!), so the higher, Class AB, bias would
actually "not be there in time" for a fast, large transient after a
quiet passage - the transient would just hit the low bias class A
setting which would then start to move slowly higher towards AB.
Philosophically, you'd need a predictive feature for this to work - no
such thing in real world signal processing. Of course, today we could
use a high-bandwidth, aperiodic delay line so that the bias could be
set up in preparation for the coming signal level, thus delaying the
whole program (no problem, it's a recording so just look ahead on the
CD!) No chance of doing that in 1947... but now we've little need to
do it as we have "infinite voltage and/or power thick straight wires
with gain", i.e. large solid state amplifiers. I did say this is
philosophical! What have I missed?
Cheers.
Roger
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brook amplifiers, sliding bias.
- From: Patrick Turner
- Re: Brook amplifiers, sliding bias.
- From: John Byrns
- Re: Brook amplifiers, sliding bias.
- References:
- Brook amplifiers, sliding bias.
- From: Patrick Turner
- Brook amplifiers, sliding bias.
- Prev by Date: Re: Electrolytic Cap Leakage revised
- Next by Date: Re: Brook amplifiers, sliding bias.
- Previous by thread: Re: Brook amplifiers, sliding bias.
- Next by thread: Re: Brook amplifiers, sliding bias.
- Index(es):