Re: Electrolytic Cap Leakage revised
- From: Peter Wieck <pfjw@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 28, 12:38�pm, "Iain Churches" <Iai...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As the result of previous discussions, and helpful
info supplied by RAT subscribers, I built a box to test
cap leakage and also reform some NOS electrolytics
that were unused but had been in storage for several
�years.
I decided to re-form the 450V caps via a 10M resistor
chain, so that they charged *veeeery* slowly indeed.
After 3 hours, they were still only at 120V. After 24
hours they were at 158V so I added a switch to short
out two of the 3.19M resistors in the chain. �This got me
to 250V in three hours.
Further info, leakage figs, and pics at:
http://www.kolumbus.fi/iain.churches/Projects/ElectrolyticCapacitorTe...
Iain
Caps are so @#$%^&*()_ cheap given the consequences of a potential
failure, I have to ask ___ WHY?___
If the answer is "because I can", all well and good as a purely
technical exercise. But I would never put such an animal in anything I
were to trust as a daily driver. Period.
Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Electrolytic Cap Leakage revised
- From: Iain Churches
- Re: Electrolytic Cap Leakage revised
- From: Ian Iveson
- Re: Electrolytic Cap Leakage revised
- References:
- Electrolytic Cap Leakage revised
- From: Iain Churches
- Electrolytic Cap Leakage revised
- Prev by Date: Re: Electrolytic Cap Leakage revised
- Next by Date: root1, a serial spammer and arsole
- Previous by thread: Re: Electrolytic Cap Leakage revised
- Next by thread: Re: Electrolytic Cap Leakage revised
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|