Re: My Dinner with Andre

On Nov 29, 1:26 am, Andre Jute <fiul...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The garage vermin Jon Yaeger <jon...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> sent a bunch of
evasions to a simple question:

I haven't heard from Henry lately, and he certainly didn't contact me to
tell me to put a sock into anything, although if he did, I'm sure your mouth
would be tops on his list.

How long is "lately"? When *did* you last hear from Henry "Porno"
Pasternack? What was the content of the discussion?

If you will not or cannot answer these questions, we are entitled to
assume that you are still under the control of Henry "Porno"
Pasternack and to discount totally whatever you say in his defence
against charges of child molestation and pornography-mongering.

It is significant that Pasternack is not here to defend himself: he
knows there is no defense because these charges are true.

Andre Jute
Investigations into child molestesr, garage vermin and sockpuppets



in article
7c60efa2-bb4a-4b36-8656-370ca7080...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andre
Jute at fiul...@xxxxxxxxx wrote on 11/27/07 11:49 AM:

It's real simple, Yaeger. Either Pasternack contacted you and asked
you to put a sock in it or Pasternack didn't contact you. Your refusal
to deny that he contacted you tells us that he did. Now we want to see
Pasternack's e-mail to you or to hear an account of his phone call
with you. Abuse will get you nowhere, sockpuppet.

Either way, we now know Pasternack wants to cut this short because he
knows there is no defense, that he is guilty as charged, that he is
indeed Pasternack the Pornographer, just as everyone knows he is.

Andre Jute
Investigations into gangbanger, child molesters and other scum

On Nov 27, 4:35 pm, Jon Yaeger <jon...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Andre,

Are you really that desperate? Feeling a bit defensive, are we?

You really are a nasty man . . . inventing a story to utterly and slander
libel a man with more knowledge and integrity than you'll ever have.
Speaking of "envy" . . . .

You say you don't accuse Henry, but you clearly do below.

Your lies and horrible character are exposed for all to see. Not only does
the "Boss" (i.e. "Emperor) have no clothes . . . he has no ethics or
decency, either.

Jon the revelator

in article
b3be0ce0-5368-401b-a857-6c0485ae6...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andre
Jute at fiul...@xxxxxxxxx wrote on 11/27/07 11:07 AM:

Jon Yaeger <jon...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yo 'Dre,

Most RAT readers could give a *** about any of this, so I tried to keep it
short.

Hey, Yaeger, will you publish the e-mail or give us an account of the
phone call in which Pasternack told you to cut this short because
there is no credible defense?

Pasternack, besides being a pornographer and child molester, on the
evidence in the threads Yaeger refers to below but hopes you won't
check, is also a wannabe sock puppeteer. For instance, Pinkerton,
after he fell out with Pasternack, published mail Pasternack sent him
including detailed instructions on how to harass Pasternack's
"enemies" on RAT.

Andre Jute
Enquiring minds want to know

Jon Yaeger <jon...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jutey-Fruity wrote:

On the Joenet, right? You found this in the Sound List archive at
Harvard, right? You should give the references, little Yaeger, because
we will check, since your word is so notoriously unreliable, even for
garage vermin.

Here is an excerpt from one of "RAF's" posts:

Er? Where? Your post just stops there, little Yaeger. Did you discover
I am right after all, that Pasternack is a nasty old pornographer and
child molester, just as those people all say? Did you in your
consternation hit the send button.

*****

Yo 'Dre,

Most RAT readers could give a *** about any of this, so I tried to keep it
short.

But I shall do as you request. Our dear readers are free to peruse the
archives as they see fit:

The complete archives of the Sound Practices list, volume 2,
indexed by author:

http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~reese/joetest/indices/articles_v02_au...
x.html

Andre's "evidence" on RAT:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.tubes/browse_thread/thread/d...
e26d9a2c/875b99843eac98bf?lnk=st&q=%22defense%22+to+charges+of+child+molest
a
tion#875b99843eac98bf
<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.tubes/browse_thread/thread/d...
ce26d9a2c/875b99843eac98bf?lnk=st&q=%22defense%22+to+charges+of+child+m
o
lestation#875b99843eac98bf>

Have fun. It's 3:48 AM GMT in Ireland. Do you have trouble sleeping?
Conscience, perhaps?? No, no chance of that . . .

Remember, Andre, past behavior the best predictor of future behavior. And
so far as I am concerned, you're just as "busted" as your sycophant West,
(albeit for very different reasons).

G'day, mate!

- Show quoted text -

Put up or shut up Andre, either there are designs for Lundahl iron
published in your book, or you stole them with false pretenses. Fraud
in otherwords. Where are they? or the book for that matter?
cheers,
Douglas
.

Quantcast