Re: Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
- From: "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:08:04 -0400
"keithr" <keith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4725d33b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Andre Jute wrote:
How about simply specifying that a Class A
amplification stage will never cease to conduct when operated within
it's
designed operating range (presuming that it was properly designed).
That's what I was trying to persuade those three clowns to say
instead. As thanks for my efforts Poopie Stevenson (Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>)wrote to me "you're an
ignorant *** and what you say is a load of bollocks". Charming.
Of course there is a viable body of opinion that an amplification stage
designed to work under Class A conditions, when driven into clipping, is
no
longer working as a Class A stage. Under that definition, they are
completely correct.
It is not a given that driving a Class A stage into clipping causes either
half of the push-pull output pair to stop conducting.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
- References:
- Re: Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
- From: Andre Jute
- Re: Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
- From: keithr
- Re: Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
- Next by Date: Re: Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
- Next by thread: Re: Why are "engineers" so poorly educated?
- Index(es):