Re: Charie McCarthy - phone home
- From: Prune <bobysgotguns_@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:15:50 GMT
This is one possible version, and far from widely accepted. Since I see
discussion has taken such a turn, I'll also link to my favorite version,
in which space/time are not things but merely artifacts of positional
attributes of quanta: http://xxx.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0412182 (related
is http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105097 and also interesting are
Marchildon's comments on this http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0303170 and
the general class of interpretations to which it belongs
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0405126 )
flipper <flipper@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:cjard21r5ll5b99atq22v5vhkps6bmnr8h@xxxxxxx:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 06:58:00 GMT, Prune <bobysgotguns_@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
flipper <flipper@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:nbsqd21spvpmdncpa8gmlosnqmiaj4nh6t@xxxxxxx:
Nice pun but no it isn't when physical structure is the interest
rather than simply the statistical odds.
The pun was unintentional.
What makes you think there is any definite 'physical structure'?
Because we don't know of anything that doesn't.
These people are working in the same direction I was.
http://www.quantummatter.com/body_spin.html
At the bottom "But note that spin, and other properties, are
attributes of the underlying quantum space rather than of the
individual particle. This is why spin, like charge, has only one value
for all particles.
---> The properties depend on the structure of space.<----" (emphasis
added)
"This structure settles a century old paradox of whether particles are
waves or point-like bits of matter. They are
--->wave structures in space.<---- (emphasis added)
There is nothing but space. As Clifford speculated 100 years ago,
matter is simply, "undulations in the fabric of space". "
Those 'wave structures in space' are the waves *I* was speaking of.
(OK, so I'm a bit late in independently postulating it)
Note, don't confuse the two 'waves'. They're talking about
"undulations in the fabric of space (rather than of the individual
particle)" whereas quantum mechanics is giving the probability of
observing that "undulation in the fabric of space."
For an illustration of it, see the animation down low on this page
http://www.quantummatter.com/
Your 'normal' quantum equations give the probability of where the
'wave-particle' is but, 'in reality' (theory) there is no 'particle'
but a 'space-wave'.
As they note, this resolves the 'wave particle duality' conundrum
since there aren't 'two things', just the space wave, and that's
precisely how I arrived at it, in postulating there is no 'duality'.
What does
that mean exactly anyway?
Same kind of thing as it means to space-time.
That's a tautology.
And?
Look it up.
.
- References:
- Re: Charie McCarthy - phone home
- From: Prune
- Re: Charie McCarthy - phone home
- From: Prune
- Re: Charie McCarthy - phone home
- From: Prune
- Re: Charie McCarthy - phone home
- From: Prune
- Re: Charie McCarthy - phone home
- From: Prune
- Re: Charie McCarthy - phone home
- Prev by Date: FA: Clean Scott 340B tube reciever (relist)
- Next by Date: P. Allison
- Previous by thread: Re: Charie McCarthy - phone home
- Next by thread: Re: Charie McCarthy - phone home
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|