Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- From: jbyrns@xxxxxxx (John Byrns)
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:33:57 -0600
In article <1143760873.944224.110270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"pfjw@xxxxxxx" <pfjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
is >certainly going to be far greater than in case of the dual-diode powerWhile the resulting DC voltage will be lower in that case, the ripple
supply design.
I think you misunderstand. The single diode is to drop the voltage
_into_ the 5AR4, thereby reducing the size needed for the dropping
resistors. The effective output ripple should be neither greater nor
worse than straight AC. So, 0.707 x input Voltage = output voltage from
the winding. A big drop, no heat generated and load still removed from
the winding.
Peter, I hate to be the one to have to tell you this but your slip is
showing. The above statement is utter nonsense, would you care to explain
it further?
Regards,
John Byrns
Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- From: pfjw@xxxxxxx
- Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- References:
- The KISS AMP: a progress report
- From: Andre Jute
- Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- From: pfjw@xxxxxxx
- Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- From: Andre Jute
- Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- From: pfjw@xxxxxxx
- Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- From: Sander deWaal
- Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- From: pfjw@xxxxxxx
- Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- From: Sander deWaal
- Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- From: pfjw@xxxxxxx
- The KISS AMP: a progress report
- Prev by Date: Re: The Catch-22 of Negative Feedback aka NFB
- Next by Date: Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- Previous by thread: Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- Next by thread: Re: The KISS AMP: a progress report
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|