Re: A Challenge for Stewart Pinkerton
- From: NonDigital@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 27 Feb 2006 15:06:04 -0800
Hi-
Your comments about this being a tube group are well-taken;
however there are people who find their way here and are qualified to
comment.
I have an active Google alert for "amplifier input current noise"
which frequently brings me here to read the prognostications of the
tube afficondidos.
I am afraid that, as an analog consultant who designs commercial
equipment, such as seismometers having noise floors of -120dBm, the
idea of using a tube for an amlifier right now would never cross my
mind.
Tubes are for the most part not even specified for several types
of noise which are critical (voltage, current, 1/f) plus from a
knowledge of their inner structure (a shaky grid susceptible to
mechanical feedback and vibrations, a red-hot cathode thrumming with
1/f noise) I cannot how anyone could even defend the use of the tube
amplifier except in the power stage of an amplifier.
Regards-
Charles Gilbert
Consultant
NonDigital.Netfirms.com
.
- References:
- A Challenge for Stewart Pinkerton
- From: John Byrns
- A Challenge for Stewart Pinkerton
- Prev by Date: Re: PP Amp driven SE
- Next by Date: Re: The Potato Amp?
- Previous by thread: Re: A Challenge for Stewart Pinkerton
- Next by thread: F/S; Acrosound TO-300 Audio output transformer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|