Re: Do low mu tubes make better line stages?
- From: "Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Dec 2005 05:02:40 -0800
Paul D. Spiegel wrote:
<<snip>>
>
> With the standard CD output voltage at 2vrms, not much gain (if any) is
> required to drive most amps. The line stage then is mostly helpful as a
> buffer to provide a high input impedence to the source component and a
> low output impedence to drive the cable and power amp.
What about the cable from the CD player to the preamp? IS the input
impedance to the preamp different from the input impedance of the power
amp itself? How do you know? Have you _measured_ it, and how?
Many people say, "You have to have a preamp, because running direct
sounds thin. The preamp fattens it up." MAYBE the "thinner" sound is
the correct sound and "fattening it up" is just adding distortion and
jacking the noise floor up.
A two box solution is always going to be better than a three box
solution if each box has its own power supply and interconects. Very
especially if those are long interconnects with RCA ends. Actually a
properly designed one box solution, or a two box where one is the power
supply, COULD be better-CD drives are quiet and can be well isolated.
I add that because sure enough that would be the smart ass retort.
Without a careful test methodology you don't know.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do low mu tubes make better line stages?
- From: Andy Evans
- Re: Do low mu tubes make better line stages?
- References:
- Do low mu tubes make better line stages?
- From: Andy Evans
- Re: Do low mu tubes make better line stages?
- From: Andre Jute
- Re: Do low mu tubes make better line stages?
- From: Paul D. Spiegel
- Do low mu tubes make better line stages?
- Prev by Date: Re: Tube Audio Question
- Next by Date: Re: Blurred sound
- Previous by thread: Re: Do low mu tubes make better line stages?
- Next by thread: Re: Do low mu tubes make better line stages?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|