Re: Battery bias directly to grid

In article <43551ED2.2319BC54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Patrick Turner <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> bruce seifried wrote:
>
> > In article <4353F476.257BE164@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > Patrick Turner <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > bruce seifried wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <4353775E.5B755A29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > > > Patrick Turner <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > But the transients you speak of don't occur any more than with any
> > > > > other
> > > > > biasing method.
> > > > >
> > > > > Patrick Turner.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > With the Dact 20K input attenuator, and a +2.4 volt dc source connected
> > > > to its wiper, you will see something on the order of a few tens of
> > > > millivolts being generated when changing the gain setting at the low
> > > > end
> > > > of the attenuator. Feeding this to the input of a dc-coupled power amp
> > > > will give you low level, audible transients. Not a deal breaker, but
> > > > not
> > > > good design practice.
> > > >
> > > > Switching the attenuator from its lowest gain setting to off, or vice
> > > > versa, will give you a 2.4 volt step signal into your input. I would
> > > > call this a rather large transient, and not especially good for the
> > > > health of any speaker attached.
> > > >
> > > > -bruce seifried
> > >
> > > I don't understand how switching gain settings changes the tube bias;
> > > there is always -2.4V at the grid regardless of the gain setting.
> >
> > Well, bias really isn't the issue here. Because the battery is a very
> > low impedance voltage source, no matter what the setting of the DACT, it
> > will still be pretty close to +2.4 volts... except when the attenuator
> > is set to 'off', and then it will rudely drop to zero volts. The issue
> > is the (small) step-change in the dc level, which manifests itself as an
> > ac signal at the input grid.
> >
> > > The only chance of transients being generated by gain level change is if
> > > the
> > > input grid draws dc current and a small dc voltage exists across the
> > > resistances
> > > of the DACT, so that when switching, you hear the switch steps.
> >
> > Are we talking about the same circuit?
>
> There is no chance of transient problems with the schematic Andre sent me,
> it has a 20k DACT attenuator, then the wiper goes to a battery, then
> to the grid.
> So at all levels of gain the bias remains and there are no transients.
>
>
> >
> >
> > The battery is constantly supplying current to the attenuator, in fact,
> > way more than any normal or abnormal grid current would be. I don't have
> > a 20K DACT series step attenuator here to measure, but roughly speaking,
> > the resistance to ground at the -60 dB setting (just above off) will be
> > on the order of 100 ohms. With a pair of 1.2 volt NiCad batteries in
> > series, you'll see a current of 24 ma flow through the attenuator.
>
> Huh?
> I don't follow you at all.
>
> You must be talking about some other circuit.
>
> Patrick Turner.
>


Aha... apparently we *are* talking about different cicuits.

Until it was changed several days ago, I had been referencing the T39
schematic on this page:

http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/T39-KISS-300B-Ultrafi-crct.jpg

I was never able to view the other schematic due to unknown browser
demons, but its description sounded like that of the T39 input biasing
arrangement, which I must say was bizarre, but easily fixable (...and I
happen to believe that a good quality capacitor makes a better capacitor
than a battery).

Carry on...

-bruce seifried


> > Assuming that the collective source impedance of the batteries is around
> > 1 ohm, you will see the voltage drop to +2.376 volts. Change the setting
> > a step higher, and the reistance is roughly around 300 ohms, for a
> > current flow of 8 ma. The voltage will change to +2.392 volts. You will
> > see a step-change of roughly 16 millivolts at the input grid. Yes, it is
> > small, and yes you will hear this.
> >
> > > I have heard this in amps with a DACT. But its a tiny effect compared to
> > > music transients.
> >
> > Please, wire this up for yourself and see what happens. I did, last
> > night, just to reaffirm what I already knew. Turn knob, see step-change
> > in voltge on scope, hear click in headphones.
> >
> > This would all be just a moot conversation if the original circuit were
> > designed better: place a resistor in series with the batteries (say
> > 100k-500k) so that that input impedance is somewhat normal ( and not 1
> > ohm!), and then place a good quality cap after the input pot. This would
> > work quite well.
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > -bruce seifried
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Battery bias directly to grid
    ... >>> millivolts being generated when changing the gain setting at the low end ... >>> Switching the attenuator from its lowest gain setting to off, ... Because the battery is a very ... > ac signal at the input grid. ...
    (rec.audio.tubes)
  • Re: T68bis "Minus Zero" potato amp circuit and layout now online
    ... input attenuator to ground will minimize noise as the ... There must always be grid leak. ... potato amp when for the same money they can build a bigmutha PP amp. ... Big fan of battery bias; ...
    (rec.audio.tubes)