Re: Battery bias directly to grid
- From: bruce seifried <vze2qwtg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:26:50 GMT
In article <4353775E.5B755A29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Patrick Turner <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But the transients you speak of don't occur any more than with any other
> biasing method.
>
> Patrick Turner.
>
With the Dact 20K input attenuator, and a +2.4 volt dc source connected
to its wiper, you will see something on the order of a few tens of
millivolts being generated when changing the gain setting at the low end
of the attenuator. Feeding this to the input of a dc-coupled power amp
will give you low level, audible transients. Not a deal breaker, but not
good design practice.
Switching the attenuator from its lowest gain setting to off, or vice
versa, will give you a 2.4 volt step signal into your input. I would
call this a rather large transient, and not especially good for the
health of any speaker attached.
-bruce seifried
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Battery bias directly to grid
- From: Patrick Turner
- Re: Battery bias directly to grid
- References:
- Battery bias directly to grid
- From: Andre Jute
- Re: Battery bias directly to grid
- From: bruce seifried
- Re: Battery bias directly to grid
- From: Patrick Turner
- Battery bias directly to grid
- Prev by Date: Re: 815 any good for audio amp
- Next by Date: Re: Actresses starve for attention - The perfect woman?
- Previous by thread: Re: Battery bias directly to grid
- Next by thread: Re: Battery bias directly to grid
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|