Re: Louis Armstrong with an old amplifier
- From: "Richard Crowley" <richard.7.crowley@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:52:17 -0800
"Choreboy" wrote ...
> Karl Uppiano wrote:
>> I'm thinking mainly of unbalanced line level consumer stuff. We used a
>> 600
>> ohm equalized telephone loop for a studio-transmitter link (about 5
>> miles)
>> for years at a radio station where I used to work. I used to have the
>> phone
>> company come tweak it just before every annual proof of performance.
>
> Is that pretty much what an ordinary telco customer gets? I've read
> that a telco will put coils across the line to compensate for capcitive
> losses. With all the problems at audio frequencies, it amazes me that
> the same lines can carry DSL.
No, really short POTS loops were not bad, but longer ones had
all sorts of things done to them (including those coils) that made
them undesirable for high-fidelity (good bandwidth + flat freq.
response). The telco had all sorts of ways of equalizing specially-
treated loops so you could get 5K or 15K response across town.
.
- References:
- Re: Louis Armstrong with an old amplifier
- From: Karl Uppiano
- Re: Louis Armstrong with an old amplifier
- From: Choreboy
- Re: Louis Armstrong with an old amplifier
- Prev by Date: Re: Louis Armstrong with an old amplifier
- Next by Date: Re: CD player quality recommendation
- Previous by thread: Re: Louis Armstrong with an old amplifier
- Next by thread: Re: Louis Armstrong with an old amplifier
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|