Merits of 2496
- From: James T <JT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:42:21 -0400
I've read through some archived r.a.p. threads where it was argued
that 16 bit/44.1k had an inaudible affect on music, at least as far as
the cited test went. I understand the merit in having more bits for
multitrack ops, where internal math can lose bits. But now I'm curious
about the widespread 'understanding' that 24-96 is better. Is there no
merit whatsoever in final mix?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merits of 2496
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: Merits of 2496
- From: geoff
- Re: Merits of 2496
- From: Mike Rivers
- Re: Merits of 2496
- From: Randy Yates
- Re: Merits of 2496
- From: Sean Conolly
- Re: Merits of 2496
- From: William Sommerwerck
- Re: Merits of 2496
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: Merits of 2496
- From: Robert Morein
- Re: Merits of 2496
- From: Les Cargill
- Re: Merits of 2496
- Prev by Date: Re: MP3 Encoding - Joint VS Full Stereo
- Next by Date: Re: Merits of 2496
- Previous by thread: MP3 Encoding - Joint VS Full Stereo
- Next by thread: Re: Merits of 2496
- Index(es):