Re: unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- From: rakmanenuff <rakmanenuff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 24, 7:23 pm, "Soundhaspriority" <nowh...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Of course, it's relevant. What do you think of the idea that it has to do
with artificial phase shifts?
Very helpful thanks. It's beyond my current understanding
of things but I'll look into that,
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- From: Soundhaspriority
- Re: unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- References:
- unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- From: rakmanenuff
- Re: unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- From: Soundhaspriority
- Re: unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- From: rakmanenuff
- Re: unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- From: Soundhaspriority
- unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- Prev by Date: Re: unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- Next by Date: Re: unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- Previous by thread: Re: unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- Next by thread: Re: unpleasant frequencies / low cut
- Index(es):