Re: trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- From: kludge@xxxxxxxxx (Scott Dorsey)
- Date: 9 Jun 2009 20:49:40 -0400
David Gravereaux <davygrvy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig0936454007FCF27DC98EF1A4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
And then when someone comes along and posts a legit signed message the
proper way all the weeds come up and jump on him for posting something
with a BINARY attachment when in fact it is in clear text if they had
looked. But why should they have to look as any correct use of MIME
should ignore what it doesn't understand.
Check the RFCs. MIME encoding is okay for email, not okay for Usenet.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- From: David Gravereaux
- Re: trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- From: David Gravereaux
- Re: trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- References:
- trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- From: Soundhaspriority
- Re: trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- From: David Gravereaux
- Re: trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- From: Richard Crowley
- Re: trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- From: David Gravereaux
- trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- Prev by Date: Re: ANOTHER POSSIBLE LAPTOP FOR MOBILE PROTOOLS SETUP??
- Next by Date: Re: trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- Previous by thread: Re: trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- Next by thread: Re: trying newsreader, Windows Live, pleasant surprise
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|