Re: THE TRUE MESSAGE OF JESUS CHRIST

On Jan 23, 5:42 pm, Fletch <geoffarn...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 23, 10:12 am, "Phildo" <P...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



"Danny T" <dannytad...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:ce564438-565e-45c1-89e0-09b91f31277c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Blind men can't see colours so is that a fairy-tail too? This is just
a really rude statement.

Actually it is just a statement of fact. Those who can see colours know they
exist. There is not one single shred of tangible evidence that any god
exists. Religion is the oldest and biggest con-trick in history designed to
cash in on the fears of the gullible about what happens to them when they
die, safe in the knowledge that nobody is ever going to come back and ask
for a refund.

I assume you believe in the RELIGION of
evolution then?

I believe in facts, such a pity you don't.

At least believers no it is faith. People that believe
in the big bang "theory" usually, actually think it is science. That's
just hilarious to me.

More fool you then.

Phildo

Facts... Hmmm.... let's see...

Fact: Evolution believes we came from rocks. Proof of this belief? Ask
any evolutionist where we came from. You will get something akin to
this answer:

The Big Bang threw out all matter, matter congealed into planets (I'm
abbreviating here). Somehow vulcanism began and clouds formed and rain
began to wash down upon the planetary rock. Minerals broke loose from
the rock and flowed into pools made by this rain. Then the minerals
and chemicals began to interact over time. Over more time enzymes came
into being (how, they cannot explain) and after even more time these
things began to interact. After a whole lot more time, something
happened and JUST THE RIGHT COMBINATION came together and formed a
LIVING CELL.

Okay, now in scientific communities it is agreed that anything that
has a one in 10 to the 17th power chance of happening or greater is
considered functionally impossible. This is accepted as the tipping
point.

For this combination -- which came from rocks -- to have occurred
would have meant a one in 10 to the 125th power chance of happening;
not just once, but as many times as was required for the alleged cell
to have also come to "life" with the ability to not only survive, but
self replicate; all systems required for life and procreation had to
be present. And the chances of that happening spontaneously, as is
alleged in Evolution "science", are one in 10 to the 10 to the 10th
power. That's a ten with 1000s of zeros behind it.

Functionally beyond impossible. Functionally beyond statistically
impossible. Just plain never gonna happen impossible.

And yet, you want to believe in a "science" that is neither science or
based in facts. Evolution is by definition a religion because it is
predicated on the fact that you have to believe absent any tangible
proof.

Fact...

Look anywhere in the universe, up, down, side to side, and all other
galactic bodies outside the Milky Way are red shifting. On a
spectrometer, red shift is evidence of retreat from our position in
space. Why are all other galactic bodies moving AWAY from this galaxy?

Fact...

Polonium 235 is a radioactive isotope with a half life of 30 seconds.
So within a few minutes it would deplete entirely. And yet, scientists
are finding polonium "spheres" in granite. Granite is supposed to have
taken millions of years to cool. And yet, polonium spheres -- the
signature of their radioactive decay -- are found everywhere in
granite. They shouldn't exist, but there they are. Why? And how?

Fact...

Lucy, the most famous "link" to humanity, austraelopithicus (sp), was
claimed by its discoverer to be part of the human chain in evolution.
After seven years of refusing to allow scientists to examine the
fossils, they finally were able to look closely at the bones. One
scientist said the bones looked very much like a small pygmy monkey he
had observed recently.

It was discovered that the bones for Lucy were actually gathered from
a scattering of over one square mile in area. All this divergence
brought together to assemble a skeleton that was questionable to begin
with?

The scientist recanted in 1996 or 97 in National Geographic, saying
Lucy was not an ancient ancestor of man, but rather had been found to
be exactly what the one observer claimed, a small species of monkey.
But, this Lucy is still touted as a real ancestor of Man in all
literature used in schools, taught as such to impressionable young
minds -- a lie taught as truth even though it is clearly known to be a
fraud.

These are but a few examples you can find if you are willing to do the
unbiased research into truth finding about our past.

One last fact:  In all the archaeological digs in the Middle East,
every one has validated the historical account given in the Holy
Bible. Not one finding has been found to refute any of the historic
accounts of places and peoples and their existence as found in the
Holy Bible.

And these, my friends, are just a few facts that you can research and
learn for yourselves.

Oh, by the way, carbon 14, the common dating isotope used to determine
the age of old things, has a half life of about 5700 years. That means
it depletes entirely at around 60,000 years. So carbon 14 cannot
possibly determine the age anything older than about 60,000 years.

--Fletch
Unashamedly Christian and defender of real truth that transforms.

Though some would say this is not the right place for it,
-Danny -
Unashamedly Christian and by your side!
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: THE TRUE MESSAGE OF JESUS CHRIST
    ... Evolution believes we came from rocks. ... all systems required for life and procreation had to ... Lucy, the most famous "link" to humanity, austraelopithicus, was ... After seven years of refusing to allow scientists to examine the ...
    (rec.audio.pro)
  • Re: A Creationist Museum of "Unnatural" History
    ... The Creationists have collected money to build a 'natural' history ... While evolution is not necessarily at odds with religion, ... scientists have found. ...
    (soc.senior.issues)
  • Re: A Creationist Museum of "Unnatural" History
    ... The Creation Museum, opening May 28, 2007, presents a "walk through ... The Creationists have collected money to build a 'natural' history ... Scientists, secularists and moderate Christians have pledged to ... And you have a lock on the Truth, evolution rules? ...
    (soc.senior.issues)
  • Re: A Creationist Museum of "Unnatural" History
    ... The Creation Museum, opening May 28, 2007, presents a "walk through ... The Creationists have collected money to build a 'natural' history ... Scientists, secularists and moderate Christians have pledged to ... And you have a lock on the Truth, evolution rules? ...
    (soc.senior.issues)
  • Re: A Creationist Museum of "Unnatural" History
    ... The Creation Museum, opening May 28, 2007, presents a "walk through ... The Creationists have collected money to build a 'natural' history ... Scientists, secularists and moderate Christians have pledged to ... And you have a lock on the Truth, evolution rules? ...
    (soc.senior.issues)
Loading