Re: For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- From: "Ethan Winer" <ethanw at ethanwiner dot com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:30:06 -0500
Randy,
PS: Ethan, I measured your clip with Matlab
If you're talking about the file in my Dither test article, I just compared that to yours (nice Hadyn cello!) and the difference at the "normal" parts of each is about 25 dB!
Again, the point is not if you can hear truncation artifacts after turning up the volume louder than you'd be able to stand for the rest of the music. It's relevant only if you can hear it with the volume control set to not blow out your speakers and ear drums. I like to listen loud! And loud is fine for this test. But if you have to increase the volume even louder still on a quiet part, then any artifacts are irrelevant.
--Ethan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- From: Sean Conolly
- Re: For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- References:
- For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- From: Ethan Winer
- Re: For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- From: Don Pearce
- Re: For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- From: Ethan Winer
- Re: For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- From: Randy Yates
- Re: For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- From: Randy Yates
- For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- Prev by Date: Re: For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- Next by Date: Re: Low cost mic/pre combo for recording home brew guit/vocs
- Previous by thread: Re: For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- Next by thread: Re: For the believers and SoundBlaster haters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|