Re: Balanced 1/4" to RCA?
- From: "Peter Larsen" <plarsen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:59:29 +0100
Laurence Payne wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:46:37 GMT, Chris Hornbeck
<chrishornbeckremovethis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
This is a major failing of the manual, IMO. Your NOI, as yet
unspecified (a strict requirement here - never, ever actually
specify your equipment on a first posting!) may very likely,
if modern, work just fine connected to an unbalanced load.
If older and coupled with an output transformer the situation
is more complicated.
Well, as it's an "audio interface", presumably to a computer, that
seems unlikely :-)
OK guys, now you got me confused. In my way of thinking bal-unbal wiring is
simple and there is nothing special, "return" always goes to shield in the
unbal end of the cable. What's the fuzz and the pertubations about, for once
I plain do not get this at all. But my MCA SP1's just arrived and there is
only one other thing that can lower a mans IQ more than a new toy, and that
is a new toy, so I probably can't really think right now even if it is not
as bad as it could have been.
Kind regards
Peter Larsen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Balanced 1/4" to RCA?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Balanced 1/4" to RCA?
- From: Chris Hornbeck
- Re: Balanced 1/4" to RCA?
- References:
- Balanced 1/4" to RCA?
- From: MS
- Re: Balanced 1/4" to RCA?
- From: Chris Hornbeck
- Re: Balanced 1/4" to RCA?
- From: Laurence Payne
- Balanced 1/4" to RCA?
- Prev by Date: Re: Balanced 1/4" to RCA?
- Next by Date: Re: You want Real Music? The Time Jumpers!
- Previous by thread: Re: Balanced 1/4" to RCA?
- Next by thread: Re: Balanced 1/4" to RCA?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading