Re: Dealing with the TV Audio Signal Path
- From: kludge@xxxxxxxxx (Scott Dorsey)
- Date: 30 Nov 2007 10:23:19 -0500
Goldsmiths <g@xxxxx> wrote:
Wow, TV sound sure is getting ripped. I assure you that, at least in mobile
units, we care a hell of a lot about the sound. But, unfortunately, most of
the bad stuff happens after it leaves us. I agree with Randy; send the best
signal you can. The old days of monitoring on-site with a 3inch Auratone
are, thankfully, just about gone. There are enough viewers out there who
actually have the gear to tell the difference to make it worth your while.
If it will ultimately be HD/surround, or even just digital, it will be worth
it.
I agree to send the best quality sound possible, but don't send sound with
too much dynamic range. Because the bad stuff will happen, and it can be
pretty bad. It may not happen until you get to the cable company... it
may not even happen until it gets to the user's TV set...
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
.
- References:
- Dealing with the TV Audio Signal Path
- From: Frank Stearns
- Re: Dealing with the TV Audio Signal Path
- From: Goldsmiths
- Dealing with the TV Audio Signal Path
- Prev by Date: Re: Weird consumer problem
- Next by Date: Re: Weird consumer problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Followup: Dealing with the TV Audio Signal Path
- Next by thread: Re: Dealing with the TV Audio Signal Path
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
