Re: Mic pres - what's the story?
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 07:00:04 +0100
Scott Fraser wrote:
"Traditionally" some people have manipulated gear for effect, mic
preamps included.
There's a huge difference betwen manipulating something to sound a certain way
and getting one that's stuck with the effect at 100%.>>
An awful lot of people find 100% Neve to be a pretty desirable effect
to be stuck with.
Not always. A friend of mine who was formerly the technical manager at AIR likes to
recall the time they ran some impulse tests through a 'traditional' Neve console when
they were puzzled over why they couldn't get the 'light and transparent' sound that
was coming out of other studios.
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mic pres - what's the story?
- From: Scott Fraser
- Re: Mic pres - what's the story?
- References:
- Re: Mic pres - what's the story?
- From: Scott Fraser
- Re: Mic pres - what's the story?
- Prev by Date: Re: Legality of offering transcription service from LP to digital
- Next by Date: Re: Music Store in Las Vegas/Santa Fe/Albuquerque
- Previous by thread: Re: Mic pres - what's the story?
- Next by thread: Re: Mic pres - what's the story?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading