Re: Legality of offering transcription service from LP to digital
- From: Bob Quintal <rquintal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 03 Aug 2007 16:11:50 GMT
Laurence Payne <NOSPAMlpayne1ATdsl.pipex.com> wrote in
news:4fm6b3dsp0pst89h2sern87m16514mlq8b@xxxxxxx:
On 03 Aug 2007 11:40:16 GMT, Bob Quintal <rquintal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>No not an extension. The laws may have been passed as Copyright
wrote:
Therefore the purpose of copyright is to promote Science and
Technology. Using Copyright to protect musical performance is a
violation of that purpose.
An extension, not a violation.
laws, but they are trade and commerce laws, Their purpose is to
restrict trade to a select group, and it's not the authors.
--
Bob Quintal
PA is y I've altered my email address.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- References:
- Re: Legality of offering transcription service from LP to digital
- From: rcrowley
- Re: Legality of offering transcription service from LP to digital
- From: Bob Quintal
- Re: Legality of offering transcription service from LP to digital
- From: Laurence Payne
- Re: Legality of offering transcription service from LP to digital
- Prev by Date: Re: Mic pres - what's the story?
- Next by Date: Re: Summer NAMM Show Report
- Previous by thread: Re: Legality of offering transcription service from LP to digital
- Next by thread: Re: Legality of offering transcription service from LP to digital
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|