Re: P.C. Vs. Mac
- From: drichard <DRichard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 May 2007 06:55:58 -0700
Can't do pro work on a cheap PC??? I can't agree with that.
You can build a computer that will do 24 tracks with ease for a few
hundred dollars. The sound quality will depend on the I/O interface,
not the computer. And even a cheap computer these days can do a fair
number of FX.
Dean
On May 8, 8:48 am, "HKC" <henrikkr...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Here in Boston almost all musicians seem to use Mac."
It's true that in pro world Mac is bigger but if your clients aren't pros
then PC is way bigger. Same thing if you're doing techno/electronica so
nothing is black and white but it's a good thing to check what your
potential clients are using.
One thing that is greatly exagerated is the price difference between the 2
choices. While it's true that you can buy very cheap PCs then it's also true
that you can't do professional recordings on these so you will have to build
a super PC which is very close to a Mac in price.
So like a wrote earlier the tough decision lies in which program you want to
use.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: P.C. Vs. Mac
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: P.C. Vs. Mac
- From: HKC
- Re: P.C. Vs. Mac
- References:
- P.C. Vs. Mac
- From: sam
- Re: P.C. Vs. Mac
- From: Ken Winokur
- Re: P.C. Vs. Mac
- From: HKC
- P.C. Vs. Mac
- Prev by Date: Re: P.C. Vs. Mac
- Next by Date: mac garageband editing
- Previous by thread: Re: P.C. Vs. Mac
- Next by thread: Re: P.C. Vs. Mac
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
