Re: Reel to Reel Archving
- From: "Six String Stu" <hawkinnc45@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:25:36 -0500
R2R to Cassette isn't a cost effective way of doing it.
Take a lesson from that Beatles CD that was floating around a couple years
ago and record it all to computer files. Then change the bitrate and put a
couple (or more) onto a single CD. Or DVD.
A lot less storage space and it'll be in digital format for when they dig
through the library 100 years from now.
"Parvardigar" <parvardigar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1177918919.477668.225360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I've been elected to backup from the non profit library our reel to
reel audios. There are several hundred mostly 5 inch reels. I don't
know the best method. I'd have to buy a reel to reel recorder/player.
Should I go reel to reel player/recorder to reel to reel player/
recorder to make the backup?
I thought it would be most efficient to run the reel to reel player/
recorder to a cassette recorder.
If I went reel to reel player/recorder to computer I'd end up with 2
disk or more for a one reel tape.
Appreciate any thoughts how best to tackle this duplication issue.
.
- References:
- Reel to Reel Archving
- From: Parvardigar
- Reel to Reel Archving
- Prev by Date: Re: MOTU vs. RME, Sound Devices portable interface
- Next by Date: Re: Reel to Reel Archving
- Previous by thread: Re: Reel to Reel Archving
- Next by thread: oooo i can't take it no more - OT
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|