Re: Hmmmmm.........


"nappy" <gospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message...

the people putting forth those assertions
are sore losers and definately not running on all cylinders.

As I said... you have nothing to add with substantiating proof.

The collapse of the three buildings doesn't concern me in the least. I saw
it happen aned it was not a controlled demolition. End of story.

What about the *hundreds* of statements from firefighters and
the dozens of live television reports of multiple explosions as
well as interviews with those who managed to escape? This is
all documented footage. Had you read any of those books, it is
unrefutable evidence, say nothing of the collapses themselves.
The collapses, as they happened for all the world to see, were
completely and totally IMPOSSIBLE without explosive implosion.
The second LAW of thermodynamics (and 'free-fall') is not a
refutable subject... it is physical, scientific LAW.

I also saw it as it happened, and knew immediately that there
was more to the story than a couple of airplanes. Have you
not seen the interviews with the designer of the WTC complex
who claims that the building were actually designed to take
MULTIPLE impacts from 707's (biggest plane at the time) ?

I suppose you choose to believe in the "pancake" THEORY...
(Note this is STILL called a THEORY)

Odd, isn't it, that the demolished pieces were the perfect size
to load directly on to trucks and transport out of the country?

The military response is also not relevant.

Now, it is you who is looking like the fool. It was the lack of NORMAL
military response, the mandatory shredding of air traffic controllers
taped conversations of that day, and the fact that for the first time
in American history the Vice President of the US was in complete
control of the military that

Unless you can name another time
the military has had to consider shooting down commercial
airliners during a terrorist attack.

Hey Nappy.... you need to do all of that homework which you
claim to already have done. Shoot-down is a STANDING ORDER !!

Or another time when planes have flown into buildings full
of fuel and the buildings have withstood them.

Please stop lying to me about having researched this subject.
You obviously have not. A loaded B-52 crashed into the Empire
State Building... I'm not kissing your ass any longer, go look it up.

Sure.. there was the tiny prop plane that hit the Empire State
building in the 40's ..

And there was that, also.

But asserting
that the towers in fact did withstand the force of the jetliners and the
fire.. well.. are you actually asserting that?

As did the building designer, it's construction foreman, and Underwriters
Labs... The building has swayed more is winter storms than it possibly
could have from the impact of the aircraft.

The fire was a joke. Huge, but far too short and far too cool to have come
close to damaging the integrity of the steel. Aircraft fuel is essentially
kerosene, most of which burned off in the initial explosion, and the rest
within the first few minutes, leaving nothing to burn but the contents of
the building.

It is firemen who reached the fires and claimed that only two small pockets
of fire, easily extinguishable with only two hoses, were remaining. These
fire department recordings were oddly "classified" until last year. You aren't
really doing any homework at all, because you refuse to consider the possibility.
I didn't want to consider it either, so I don't know as how I blame you too much.

No.. It doesn't make me believe some whacko conspiracy theory.

There is no THEORY here.... Thue buildings could not POSSIBLY have
fallen in the manner in which they did without explosives. Consult ANY
physics professor.

What on earth would the point have been?

Look around you. Control, fear, intimidation, false grounds for aggression
in order to obtain control of the world's last oil and mineral resources...
just for starters. There's no sense in continuing this because you aren't
doing any homework... you're just spouting off about 'kooks' and 'theories'.

the US did NOT <> blow up its own buildings.

Please prove this. There is a preponderance of evidence to the contrary.

There is absolutely no evidence to the contrary. Not a single shred.

I have offerred you hundreds of pages of documentation, dozens of films
and dozens more complete books on the subject, and all you can do is
offer talk. You aren't holding your ground here. I would have expected
better from you... but then I stop and think about it. There really isn't
anything for you to hold onto as proof except 'faith'.

It is lunacy.

Failure to ask the important questions is lunacy.

Just offering the same old links to well know kook sites is NOT proof.

Are you afraid to research any of the books? The films? The papers
from the university professors and the inquirys of congressmen and
senators?

Your argument is one of nothing but words... I won't address it again.










.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Controling Event Sequencing...
    ... have it execute AFTER the OnClick in completely done ... ... control exposes this event to the programmer to allow him / her to capture ... immidiately fire after the programmer's - ItemChanged event ... ... I can use my custom event ueMyEventChanged to access the ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom <- WARNING! TROLL! Probably Mary Zornio in drag again,
    ... >> prevent originals from being removed and it cut off the numbers. ... Scott never mentions it AFAIK. ... he had to fire it a second time. ... Control portion of the Static Fire test there is only one maneuver ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Military - Orders and Advancement.
    ... Actually I was unusual in that I made E-5 'honestly' as opposed to ... was a 3305 (Trident-I and Trident-I Backfit Strategic Missile Fire ... Control), but the FTB rate also included 3304 (Posiedon Fleet ... people were advanced via the test each cycle for a total of 4 E-5's ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: NBC: My pet subject
    ... actual controlled demolition not causing massive dust and debris clouds. ... This is where witnesses heard explosions. ... By that, I meant that the core pillars were blown, and came down first, ... to people but on the other, he was talking to a Fire Department ...
    (rec.music.artists.springsteen)
  • Re: Prevented from saving data in the field
    ... The form's AfterUpdate fires after the table has been updated, ... control's AfterUpdate fires after the control has been updated. ... AfterUpdate event of the control will fire before the form's BeforeUpdate ...
    (microsoft.public.access.forms)