Re: M-Audio Fast Track Pro vs ....?
- From: "Mike Rivers" <mrivers@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Feb 2006 04:58:47 -0800
_DG wrote:
Given the marketeering angle, I'm surprised that they
didn't throw USB 2.0 chipset in the FT Pro. It would have given the
sales crew something to highlight, especially in the light of the
faster Firewire competition. USB 2.0 devices are supposed to be
backward compatible with 1.1, but that may not always hold true.
I suspect that there's more to it than just "throw" in a different
chip. USB2.0 hasn't been very big for audio. Edirol (who, by the way,
was the first to come up with commercial USB1.1 audio products) seems
to be the only one doing it.
.
- References:
- M-Audio Fast Track Pro vs ....?
- From: _DG
- Re: M-Audio Fast Track Pro vs ....?
- From: Mike Rivers
- Re: M-Audio Fast Track Pro vs ....?
- From: _DG
- M-Audio Fast Track Pro vs ....?
- Prev by Date: Re: Adobe Audition 1.5: Record from device A, play full mix through device B (while recording?)
- Next by Date: Re: Changing Tape Formulation
- Previous by thread: Re: M-Audio Fast Track Pro vs ....?
- Next by thread: Re: M-Audio Fast Track Pro vs ....?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|