Re: Vox AC30 CC the real story....
- From: Pooh Bear <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:08:36 +0000
Mike Rivers wrote:
> Rafael Vanoni wrote:
>
> > Well, as evolution tends to go about its business, Digitech one day
> > discontinued most of the classic rp units, keeping only the new,
> > cheaper, worst ones. And to the disapointment of maybe 2-3 hundred
> > customers, they pulled the plug on all of their lists without any
> > explanation.
>
> Therein lies the problem - there were only 200-300 customers, and they
> were customers of a discontinued product. The company isn't making any
> money from you and they have to concentrate on the 20,000 people who
> will buy the Jimi Hendrix pedal so they can sound just like Jimi.
>
> Everything has become cheaper (you probably paid a small fortune for
> your Digitech processor) and one of the ways that a manufacturer can
> cut costs drastically is to cut back on support. Not just on-line
> support, but phone support, and most important, sustaining support for
> second-hand users. It's just not profitable, and once a company reaches
> a certain size (or gets bought out enough times like Digitech) they
> have to show a profit. The customers won't pay more money for the
> products, so they have to cut somewhere, and there's only so many parts
> you can leave out.
>
> When TASCAM started their forum in 1998 or so the manager wanted all of
> the product specialists to participate. Then they changed management,
> changed direction, and you rarely heard from any of the TASCAM folks.
> Then it was taken down. Mackie has a similar forum but their policy has
> always been on of only monitoring and not participating other than to
> correct a posting that's a gross error.
>
> Strange about the Vox amplifier. I suppose that what will happen is
> that those currently in stock will be sold out and it will be replaced
> by another model. Manufacturers of this sort of gear don't do recalls
> unless it's for safety reasons. And one reason why there's so little
> money left over for technological innovation and support is because of
> all the money they have to put toward product safety so they don't have
> to recall or get sued for something that can actually win a court case.
>
> Dusk did the right thing - he tried the amplifier in a store, heard
> something he knew he didn't like, and didn't buy it. If more people
> would do that rather than waiting until after they plunked down their
> money, found that there was something weird about what they bought, and
> post an "is this normal?" message on a forum, manufacturers would get
> the idea that they're doing something wrong. But as long as people keep
> buying, they'll keep selling.
What amazes me is that an AC30 contains very simple circuitry. How did they
manage to screw up copying it ?
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vox AC30 CC the real story....
- From: Sean Conolly
- Re: Vox AC30 CC the real story....
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: Vox AC30 CC the real story....
- References:
- Vox AC30 CC the real story....
- From: duskb
- Re: Vox AC30 CC the real story....
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: Vox AC30 CC the real story....
- From: Rafael Vanoni
- Re: Vox AC30 CC the real story....
- From: Mike Rivers
- Vox AC30 CC the real story....
- Prev by Date: Re: PC recording levels not translating
- Next by Date: Re: PC recording levels not translating
- Previous by thread: Re: Vox AC30 CC the real story....
- Next by thread: Re: Vox AC30 CC the real story....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|