Re: Dynebolic Linux Released!
- From: "punter" <philicorda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Dec 2005 15:51:44 -0800
Geoff@work wrote:
> "punter" <philicorda@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1135874734.579177.136390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > "Why only records as 32 bit ? There will never be true 24 bit
> > converters, so
> > recording a larger file (ie 32 bit) acheives nothing but extra CPU and
> > data
> > throughput. Are you sure it doesn't *record* at a real bitdepth and
> > *process* at 32, like most other applications.
> >
> > geoff"
> >
> > The short answer is that it avoids constantly converting and rounding
> > between the internal 32bit float and external 16/24 integer formats on
> > disk.
>
> Dunno about others, but my audio apps maintain source file untouched from
> new. Any editing, effects, levelling happen only on preview(play) and to the
> final rendered file/s.
Great. It's only really relevant for Jack apps under Linux.
It does however solve problems with loss of precision when need to
render soft synths to disk, bounce tracks and re-import, or apply
offline effects as well.
The point is moot anyway, as all the Windows sequencers let you work at
32bit float if you like.
>
> >
> > The long answer is:
> > Applications like Ardour run as clients of the Jack sound server, and
> > never directly control the sound card.
> > As far as the clients are concerned all audio is always 32bit float.
> > Dithering up/down to the sound card's capabilities, buffering and
> > sample rate control are handled by the Jack sound server.
> > This is important as it enables multiple applications to communicate
> > and synchronise locally or over the network in a unixy fashion.
>
> Very elegant. How come there are no significanyt apps. Unless you think of
> Ardour as being significant.
It works, is easy enough to use, offers enough features and is reliable
enough for me to consider it an alternative for audio to Cubase.
Believe me, for a Linux sequencer, that's significant. For Free
software with open file formats, it's very unusual.
There's thousands of other audio programs, from softsynths to
forensics, but you will have to tell me what you consider to be a
significant application for me to pick examples.
>
> > With Windows the fashion is for running one monolithic audio
> > application at once,
>
> No ...
I guess there is Rewire on Windows which lets you run some subset of
Rewire compatible applications synchronised at sample level, but it's
quite limited compared to Jack.
>
> >and each application handles the sound card and
> > buffering/bit depths/sample rates in it's own peculiar way
>
> I don't think 'peculiar' is the approprite word there.
That's 'peculiar' as in 'belonging distinctively or primarily to one
person, group, or kind'.
Windows apps don't share the same code or a common sound server to
perform this task, and so peoples experiences of reliability with
different combinations of sequencer software, drivers, sound cards and
computers vary greatly.
Witness the bizzare and unaccountable flaming from advocates of various
Windows sequencers on this group for examples.
>
> > (MME,WDM,ASIO,DirectX,EASI,GSIF). This works fine, but is neither clean
> > or architecturally interesting enough for free software developers. :)
>
> ???
That was a joke the various Windows audio 'standards' and free software
developers. It does not bear explanation.
>
> > Most people I know using Ardour have an RME or one of the myriad of
> > ENVY24 chipset based sound cards
>
> They don't exactly have any other choice, do they ?
I guess there are also the EchoAudio, Digigram, SEKD cards, and a whole
heap of consumer ones and USB devices. How many cards do you need?
>
> >and so tend to record at 24bit.
>
> Not 32 ?
Nah. 32bit float is just the format the files are stored in.
>
> >Also, Linux is a bit of a monster at disk i/o so a few extra bits don't
> >cause
> > problems.
>
> That's just as well then.
>
> geoff
>
>
>
>
> geoff
.
- References:
- Re: Dynebolic Linux Released!
- From: Mike Rivers
- Re: Dynebolic Linux Released!
- From: Sean Conolly
- Re: Dynebolic Linux Released!
- From: Sean Conolly
- Re: Dynebolic Linux Released!
- From: punter
- Re: Dynebolic Linux Released!
- From: Geoff@work
- Re: Dynebolic Linux Released!
- From: punter
- Re: Dynebolic Linux Released!
- From: Geoff@work
- Re: Dynebolic Linux Released!
- Prev by Date: Re: Dynebolic Linux Released!
- Next by Date: Re: Second track reverse echo
- Previous by thread: Re: Dynebolic Linux Released!
- Next by thread: Logic Audio
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|