Re: from Cents to Hertz and back again
- From: "Mike Rivers" <mrivers@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Oct 2005 15:27:11 -0700
Julian wrote:
> I do have a gripe with them that they incorrectly identify a perfect
> 5th as 1.498307 : 1 and perfect fourth as 1.334840 :
Well, nobody's perfect. I think the term "perfect fifth" is like "48V
phantom power" in another discussion. Everyone assumes that if it's a
fifth, it's perfect. The ratios in that calculator are for an equal
tempered scale, which, as everone knows, does not have "perfect" fifths
or thirds. This is why your guitar's B string is always out of tune
unless you're playing in the key of B (in which case every other string
it out of tune).
Heck, in the REAL MUSICIAN'S world, today a fifth isn't a fifth any
more, it's 750 mL.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: from Cents to Hertz and back again
- From: Julian
- Re: from Cents to Hertz and back again
- References:
- from Cents to Hertz and back again
- From: apa
- Re: from Cents to Hertz and back again
- From: Jens Rodrigo
- Re: from Cents to Hertz and back again
- From: Julian
- from Cents to Hertz and back again
- Prev by Date: Re: Bluetooth: Creative vs Logitech
- Next by Date: Re: Mackie 1604 question
- Previous by thread: Re: from Cents to Hertz and back again
- Next by thread: Re: from Cents to Hertz and back again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|