Re: RAID 0 OR NOT?
- From: "jixelub" <dsmith10@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Oct 2005 18:03:45 -0700
Thank you for your response.
Actually, I'm more interested in speed rather than security as these
files are pretty much backed up already in their original format on
CD's and DAT's and could be easitly redone if there were a HD failure.
I was wondering if there is a real difference in performance between
the serial ATA hard drives that come standard with computers these days
and the optional RAID O configuration.
Since these audio programs are hard drive based, I would think that
faster HD performance would be a definate plus.
Or, the difference might be so minimal that it's not worth it.
(Incidently, I asked Sony Pictures (who market Sound Forge) this
question and they couldn't tell me. I don't think they know much
about what they're selling).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAID 0 OR NOT?
- From: Roger W. Norman
- Re: RAID 0 OR NOT?
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: RAID 0 OR NOT?
- From: Harry Lavo
- Re: RAID 0 OR NOT?
- From: John L Rice
- Re: RAID 0 OR NOT?
- From: Pawel Kusmierek
- Re: RAID 0 OR NOT?
- References:
- RAID 0 OR NOT?
- From: jixelub
- Re: RAID 0 OR NOT?
- From: Arny Krueger
- RAID 0 OR NOT?
- Prev by Date: Re: dbx 160xt schematic
- Next by Date: Re: RAID 0 OR NOT?
- Previous by thread: Re: RAID 0 OR NOT?
- Next by thread: Re: RAID 0 OR NOT?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|