Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: chevdo@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Chevdo)
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:45:56 GMT
In article <slrndjj0q1.f542.syl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, syl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
says...
>
>(delurk ...)
>
>Chevdo wrote:
>
>> Proof of a claim is on the onus of a claimant.
>
>You claim that other posters in this thread do not know whether the
>Behringer tube preamp under discussion uses a starved-plate design.
>By your own words, the onus is on you to proove your claim.
This thread is proof of that claim, nobody has said they have direct experience
with the Behringer tube preamp.
.
- References:
- Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Todd McFadden
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: hank alrich
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Sylvain Robitaille
- Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Prev by Date: Re: OT:Harry Belafonte & Danny Glover Speak Out on Katrina
- Next by Date: Re: -Questions for John Atkinson- NOT! def OT
- Previous by thread: Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Next by thread: Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|