Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: chevdo@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Chevdo)
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:48:56 GMT
In article <1h3jnkb.b5tae01dk1g96N%walkinay@xxxxxxxxxxx>, walkinay@xxxxxxxxxxx
says...
>
>Chevdo wrote:
>
>> Well, as the article this thread refers to infers, the circuit may not
include
>> the tube at all.
>
>Heresay, and if you put much stock in the article as a source of
>information, the brainless thing stands like a tripod.
>
>
I'm have not been putting any stock in anything, I have been discussing the
topic of the thread.
.
- References:
- Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Todd McFadden
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: hank alrich
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: david gourley
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: hank alrich
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: hank alrich
- Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Prev by Date: Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Next by Date: Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Previous by thread: Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Next by thread: Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|