Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Sylvain Robitaille <syl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:37:05 +0000 (UTC)
(delurk ...)
Chevdo wrote:
> Proof of a claim is on the onus of a claimant.
You claim that other posters in this thread do not know whether the
Behringer tube preamp under discussion uses a starved-plate design.
By your own words, the onus is on you to proove your claim.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sylvain Robitaille syl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Major in Electroacoustic Studies Concordia University
Faculty of Fine Arts / Music Department Montreal, Quebec, Canada
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- References:
- Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Todd McFadden
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Scott Dorsey
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: Chevdo
- Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- From: hank alrich
- Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Prev by Date: Re: PreSonus Firepod
- Next by Date: Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Previous by thread: Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Next by thread: Re: Behringer - Very Disturbing Article
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|