Re: I can't believe...


"Roger W. Norman" <Roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dsidnbecnKwiboXeRVn-ug@xxxxxxxxxx
> Jona, if you were any good, you could work at 16/44.1 too. But you can't
> can you?


Are we reaching now? I think so.. pretty poor for a master blogger.






Just like you can't argue a case. Just because I chose to offer
> my home to a family that might need it, you chose to think that I won't
come
> up with a donation or that's it's a hollow offer?

yup.

> You, sir, are the idiot

yak.


> you represent. People know what I stand for. People know that I will do
> what I say. Show the compassion instead of the money, because the money
is
> as easy as sending a check, and offering any family 18 months of a place
to
> live is more than you could possibly understand. ***, you probably
> couldn't go day to day with the same attitude, much less such a
committment.
> Hell, I bet you don't even own your own house, so you couldn't possibly
> offer someone 18 months of shelter. But I do. And I can. And when I do
> it's for real.

You're a real piece of work. Now you're going to ask me to tell you if I own
a house or not?

I own more than my own house. Raised three kids in it. In one of the most
expensive places on the planet.

You're really reaching again. It's pretty sad, really.






>
> You are lower than the belly of a worm on a rain soaked day. Send your
> money. I'm sure it will help.

done that. Your turn now.



> And 18 months from now when people still
> don't have homes just *** off, ok.

So grab a fucking hammer and join Habitat for Humanity.



> In the meantime, I will do what I can
> to get a family here to live their lives and get back on their feet.

Sure.. and you can get 'em jobs and pay for hospitalization, food and
everything!

Well.. you be sure and update us on your quest.


> You, if
> you want to get in, can suck *** and then I'll turn you away for being a
> homosexual.

You're just about the classiest there is.









>
> --
>
>
> Roger W. Norman
> SirMusic Studio
> http://blogs.salon.com/0004478/
>
> "Jona Vark" <noemail@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:tO5Se.401$pt.91@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Roger W. Norman" <Roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:KvKdnbf3gtbNQIXeRVn-1Q@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > Obviously you didn't understand the idea that cash was not a solution
to
> a
> > > problem. Perhaps you believe spending money on a problem you don't
> > > understand should produce more reasonable results? Like if your
> recording
> > > isn't good enough moving to 24/96 is the answer? Correct me if I'm
> wrong,
> > > but cash doesn't get to the people, and everything I've said about
> getting
> > a
> > > job, the length of the problem, and working on how children perceive
> > what's
> > > happening didn't touch you.
> > >
> > > I guess this proves that idiots are born every minute. I just didn't
> > expect
> > > to get one.
> >
> >
> >
> > What on earth are you talking about? 24/96? That's your analogy? That's
> > weak. There are many problems that can be solved with a higher sample
rate
> > and wider data width. Otherwise we'd all be working at 44.1/16.
> >
> > Look.. why don't you DRIVE down there in a van and pick up some people
to
> > come and live in your house?
> >
> > The Red Cross and other relief organizations need money and blood. Not
> extra
> > space in DC.
> >
> > You're the idiot here.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


.