Re: Mackie Onyx 400F
- From: "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:00:24 -0400
<settled@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1125433320.276353.34610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To me the Onyx 400F is a an attractive entry-level
> package for capturing 1-4 channels of sound, but the
> quoted -3dB 10-24K (-48K, -96K) frequency response is
> discouraging. Is it a fair assumption the Mackie
> engineers put a zero at 10Hz? Do I have to recall some
> math to figure out the loss at the traditional lower
> bound of 20 Hz?
If the low end were set by a single pole filter, then the
response would be -3 dB at 10 Hz and -1 dB at 20 Hz.
.
- References:
- Mackie Onyx 400F
- From: settled@xxxxxxxxx
- Mackie Onyx 400F
- Prev by Date: Re: Electrets, Hey Scott
- Next by Date: Re: Burglary at Focusrite & Novation
- Previous by thread: Re: Mackie Onyx 400F
- Next by thread: Gigastudio 3.0 Orchestra
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
