Re: Mackie Onyx 400F
- From: walkinay@xxxxxxxxxxx (hank alrich)
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:28:42 GMT
settled@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> To me the Onyx 400F is a an attractive entry-level package for
> capturing 1-4 channels of sound, but the quoted -3dB 10-24K (-48K,
> -96K) frequency response is discouraging. Is it a fair assumption the
> Mackie engineers put a zero at 10Hz? Do I have to recall some math to
> figure out the loss at the traditional lower bound of 20 Hz?
Hunh? <g>
--
ha
.
- References:
- Mackie Onyx 400F
- From: settled@xxxxxxxxx
- Mackie Onyx 400F
- Prev by Date: Re: Eqing Monitors?
- Next by Date: Re: why does analog sound so good?
- Previous by thread: Mackie Onyx 400F
- Next by thread: Re: Mackie Onyx 400F
- Index(es):
