Re: The fuckuplicans' idea of 'discussion'



On Sep 12, 10:19 am, ScottW2 <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 12, 1:48 am, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On 12 Set, 01:49, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

<artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 10, 10:37 pm, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sep 10, 12:39 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

<artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 10, 10:40 am, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sep 10, 11:28 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

<artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 10, 9:25 am, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sep 10, 1:13 am, George M. Middius <cmndr_geo...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

        Rep. Joe Wilson shouts 'you lie' at Obama

        A Republican House member shouted "You lie" during
        President Obama's health care speech to Congress on
        Wednesday, and members of both parties condemned
        the heckling.
        <http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/09/10/obama.heckled.speech/index.html>

this isn't Great Britain!

What a massive amount of self-control this Wilson exhibits. If this
guy was in the Army he be packing his duffle bag for a flight home.

like you told Bush he lied, right here on rao?

No, Clyde. Not like that at all.

He can say Obama lied in the response. He can say Obama lied the next
morning from the floor.

If the republicans have devolved to the point of shouting out insults
during nationally televised speeches they need to disband and regroup.

What I mean, Clyde, is that if a general is conducting a briefing and
there is information that I don't think is correct I have some
options. I can yell "You lie!" at the general. I can ask about it if
there is a question and answer period. I can talk to the general after
the brief and ask him to clear up my misunderstanding. I can confirm
my data and offer it to the general. I can submit my position up my
chain of command. There are other options too.

If I choose to shout out "You lie!" I'll be on the next flight home.

How much would you like to wager that Wilson is the newest poster
child for Limbaugh, Hannity, etc.?

as a militqry officer, you are not allowed to do waht you do here on
RAO.

Strawman, and not true. I do nothing illegal here under the UCMJ or
any other legal provisions.

Please provide reference to what laws you feel I break.

That is why either you are noit a military officer, or,
if you are, that is why you hide youe identity.
In that case, you are a coward,

As for hiding my identity, what has happened to Marc is evidence
enough for the prudence of my decision to remain anonymous.

And we will continue to  not believe you

  Frankly, I don't care.  Usenet resumes are invariably invoked when
the authors posts don't stand up to scrutiny.

So you're calling the senior military leadership a group of liars too.
OK, 2pid, your 'differing POV' is equally valid. LoL.

Thats when the claims of expertise, or wee minded BS spew forth.

I see. Well, stupid is as stupid does.

Lots of interesting studies on why people lie and how often.
Consider this quote and how often it pertains to usenet.

"There are social payoffs, too: Studies have shown that people who lie
frequently are viewed as friendlier and more amiable than their more
truthful counterparts. Still, lying is generally regarded as immoral
and distasteful. "No one likes being lied to," says former FBI agent
and lying expert Joe Navarro. "We feel betrayed. When is it that they
are telling the truth?" And people do really want to know the truth."

http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/brain-and-behavior/2009/05/1...

Surprise, suprise!

That quote has nothing to do with anything except your strawman.

2pid, your a imbecile. Consider that statement and how often it
applies on RAO. LoL.
.


Loading