Re: NAT: Another IG Out

On Jul 3, 10:02 am, ScottW2 <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 2, 8:53 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

<artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 2, 7:53 pm, Clyde Slick <Mr.clydesl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 2, 2:21 pm, ScottW <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 Amtrak bosses
have effectively gagged their budgetary watchdogs from communicating
with Congress without preapproval; required that all Amtrak documents
be “pre-screened” (and in some cases redacted) before being turned
over to the inspector general’s office; and taken control over the
IG’s $5 million portion of federal stimulus dollars.

That's ok, they use "transparent" ink!

Michelle Malkin is a very good propagandist.

  How Grassley?

"Grassley asks Amtrak to respond to report describing interference
with IG work"

"Grassley seeks information about possible interference with work of
Amtrak IG"

As usual, you can't refute one item in Malkin's story which provided
all these references, so you attack the messenger.  Well you've now
got lots of messengers including a democrat congressman for your weak

It's under investigation, 2pid. Malkin tries to get people ALL WORKED
UP!!!!!!!! (And it works with simps like you.)

Remember, 2pid:

For 2pid:

"Trying to determine what is going on in the world by reading
newspapers is like trying to tell the time by watching the second
of a clock."

Duh. It'll play out.

(You're so knee-jerk you'll probably try to call for CAS. LoL.)