Re: NAT: Gov. gone Wild

On 18 Mai, 22:30, ScottW2 <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 18, 2:14 pm, Mr.clydesl...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:





On 18 Mai, 13:31, ScottW2 <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 18, 10:16 am, Mr.clydesl...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 18 Mai, 12:48, ScottW2 <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 17, 6:31 pm, Mr.clydesl...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

the government has to justify a public purpose when challenged

 But aren't subject to damages when they f up a business deal
by improperly threatening ED.

If it is obviously improper, everyone can see that for what it is,
and it doesn't *** up the deal.
the buyer will proceed.

BS.  Legal costs can be deterring.

There are no legal costs until a condemnation suit has actually been
filed.

Any buyer would have to consider the risk of that being
much greater since the governors threat.







If condemnation does proceed, the new owner will still get
fair market value.

Impending threats of condemnatiin have more
psychological impact on single family residential properties,
and does make them hard to move.
Investment propeties are different.

If the legislature determines that govt ownership of the tracks serves
a public
purpose, it can condemn.

Have they done that?  All I saw was a threat designed to derail a
business transaction that might lead to the Preakness moving and
possibly out of state, bad politically for the governor no doubt.

no
and like I said, the Preakness race and the real property
of the racetrack are two different things

 Can't have the Preakness at Pemlico after Pemlico becomes
condo's.  Isn't that the big problem for the governor? If the
Preakness
moves and ends up going out of state, he'll be criticized?

there is nothing he can do to forefully
keep it in Maryland. It is not the
property of the state, nor can the state condemn a race.

So what's his problem?  Why did he make the threat?

ScottW-

because he thinks like you, all knee jerk reaction,
no attention paid to nasty details like constraints of reality.
.

Loading