Re: Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- From: John Atkinson <stereoeditor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:10:03 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 6, 8:36 am, "Soundhaspriority" <nowh...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Iain Churches" <Iai...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eJSil.129449$_03.48188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I enjoyed it very much. It's well worth a listen.
Bob and I approach recording from totally opposite
directions. Discussion with him is most interesting.
Iain, you approach recording with experience, knowledge, judgement. I'm
afraid my relative ignorance could not be called a direction.
But you were fortunate to be able to work with such a
talented singer Bob. Thank you very much for sending
me the file. I will get back to you with some comments,
but did you change the mike position halfway through?
The first take is a little too distant for my taste, but the
second does sound closer.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- From: Soundhaspriority
- Re: Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- References:
- Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- From: Soundhaspriority
- Re: Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- From: Jenn
- Re: Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- From: Clyde Slick
- Re: Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- From: Iain Churches
- Re: Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- From: Soundhaspriority
- Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- Prev by Date: Re: Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- Next by Date: Re: Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- Previous by thread: Re: Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- Next by thread: Re: Q for Jenn, Harry re binaural recording
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|