Re: the superiority of 96 kHz sampling Options no one mentioned aliasing

From: MiNe 109 <smcelroy2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:44:49 -0500

In article <xPKdncMbi97XY_XVnZ2dnUVZ_obinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Posted in rec.audio.pro:

Right you are. My bad.

Bravo!

BTW, I accept the 'not wanting to be crapped on' excuse for not posting
your work, although it does put you at a disadvantage in other ways.

Stephen
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: the superiority of 96 kHz sampling Options no one mentioned aliasing
  - From: Arny Krueger
- Arnii Kroo***'s lame excuses
  - From: George M . Middius

Prev by Date: Re: OT:conducting
Next by Date: Re: OT:conducting
Previous by thread: Mercury Records/PAX AM/FM/8-track surround sound receiver-$100 free shipping USA-serviced-tested-playing
Next by thread: Arnii Kroo***'s lame excuses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread