Re: RAHE dying?

On Jun 28, 1:31 pm, "ScottW" <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:d29dfb33-4ec6-4c0d-942f-22eddce27c37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 28, 11:50 am, "ScottW" <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
On Jun 28, 11:27 am, "ScottW" <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
On Jun 28, 10:16 am, "ScottW" <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
On Jun 28, 2:54 am, "ScottW" <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

No, just these morons who stopped quarantines
when this heinous disease could have been contained
and possibly eradicated.

:Maybe they should be branded, right, 2pid?

"Like TB, HIV is viewed by the state as a medical condition for which an
individual bears social responsibility."

I agree. If we applied that policy future generations could
have enjoyed greater freedom, instead for the luxury of
a few, everyone must be wary forever.

Guess who has a successful Aids
program?http://www.thebody.com/content/art32967.html

:You're a pretty weak conservative.

I'm a liberal, didn't you know?

:Apparently, using your warped definition.

:So we should have national health care, yes?

For AIDS we already do.

:Then why the need for this?

:http://www.health.state.ny.us/diseases/aids/resources/adap/index.htm

We have public health care. Do we have to nationalize everything?

And are these people lying, or are you?

"Those without insurance also do not receive care recommended for
chronic diseases, like regular eye and foot exams to prevent blindness
and amputation in persons with diabetes, and lack regular access to
medications to manage conditions such as hypertension or HIV
infection."

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/may2002/ins-m25.shtml

Apparently they are.http://hab.hrsa.gov/aboutus.htm

Bonehead.

Lots of federal programs for treating AIDs
which provide lifetime benefits.

That does not discuss how many are not covered, 2pid. Are you claiming
that every HIV/AIDS patient has coverage?

Read it again.

http://www.state.nj.us/health/aids/homecare.shtml
How long will the HIV Home Care Program provide services?

<snip>

"Although uninsured HIV-infected individuals without symptoms are
generally ineligible for Medicaid coverage, individual states can
apply to expand coverage for early treatment using Medicaid waivers or
demonstration programs..."

"Conclusions: From a societal perspective, earlier initiation of HAART
for HIV-infected patients who do not yet have AIDS is cost-effective
compared to deferring therapy, but expanding coverage will put new
demands on government budgets over five years. Implications for
Policy, Delivery or Practice: States should consider Medicaid waivers
or Medicaid demonstration programs to expand coverage for patients
with HIV infection."

http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=102272532.html

"Indeed, despite the existence of national treatment guidelines5
calling for early access to medical care and treatment, including
highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), an estimated 42% to 59%
of the almost one million people living with HIV/AIDS in the U.S. are
not in regular care6 (see Figure 1). While a proportion of these
individuals may not know their HIV status (up to one-third of those
living with HIV/AIDS7), others do not have access to insurance
coverage (or face limits in their coverage) or care programs to help
them afford the high cost of HIV treatment and services."

http://www.napwa.org/living/resources/docs/Financing-HIV-AIDS-Care-A-Quilt-with-Many-Holes.pdf

They all aren't covered, 2pid. Sorry.

But I don't expect you to admit that you're wrong, so let's see the
next spin from Der Spinmeister.
.