Re: OT:Olbermann on oil/McCain


"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artyguy04@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b33b846b-5069-418b-b879-6deda4feb8cd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 23, 11:31 pm, "ScottW" <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:3ee88924-1949-4dda-a51d-0f08d7bd6e8e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 23, 9:31 pm, "ScottW" <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" <artygu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:bf60a71f-067d-463c-9d01-3e263e0c7068@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 23, 5:48 pm, ScottW <Scott...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 23, 11:48 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
Aside from trying to delve into a side issue (as Stephen pointed out
that you are prone to do),

Was that before or after he demonstrated that you are not to
be trusted with quotes?

:The quote was accurate.

An accurate quote is something that was actually said or written
by the person it was attributed to. You are not accurate.

:Now off this side issue, 2pid. You're a moron.

Whatever you say Miss Mapes.

you were quoted very accurately for
meaning. No embellishment, no missed meaning.

Which would be quite a change for you.

:Do you have a problem?

Yes

:Did I change your 'meaning'?

You changed my context.

:Please tell me how your 'context' was changed.

I didn't say exactly what you wrote.
If you changed no meaning, why not just stick with what I wrote?

:Because I'd have to go back and look up every stupid thing you've
:said, and there isn't enopugh time in the day?

If you're too lazy to quote, then don't quote.



:Did I, or did I not, effectively change what you had said?

:It was very accurate, was it not?

BTW, Obamas aids are stupid and it does lead to questions of
his choice of appointments and vetting etc.

:Like lobbyists on your campaign committee?

Is being a lobbyists suddenly make a person a bad person?
Too broad a brush IMO. Lots of gov't and military folks
are now lobbyists. Should that disqualify them from ever
returning to gov't?

Same issue comes up in the hijabs incident.
Obama says, ""The actions of these volunteers were unacceptable and in no way
reflect any policy of my campaign," he said. "I take deepest offense to and
will
continue to fight against discrimination against people of any religious group
or background."
So where did the buck stop on that little incident?

:2pid's lack of 'experience' with politics is glaringly
:obvious...again.

Your lack of ability to make cogent comment is glaringly
obvious again.

:He doesn't know *** about politics or the military, but he's got some
:By God opinions!

Where will it stop if he's president?

:I think McCain will have secret energy panels...again.

and the latest is that Obama is deeply in the corn ethanol camp.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/23/us/politics/23ethanol.html?_r=1&hp&oref=login


Then there's the question of his acquiescing to demands of personal apologies.

:What a fucking imbecile.
:2pid, you are a walking poster child for abortion.

It's almost a pavlovian response with you. You just
can't stop drooling with childishness.

ScottW


.

Loading