Re: OT:Olbermann on oil/McCain

In article <5vy7k.3809$F97.1874@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"MiNe 109" <smcelroy2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:smcelroy2-74F906.14425622062008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <PEx7k.4618$3q7.2898@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"MiNe 109" <smcelroy2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:smcelroy2-6F4BD7.14133422062008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <Iix7k.1815$%q.1101@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ScottW" <ScottW48@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Is that what you think you do? Maybe you should try to discuss the
issues
instead. Nevermind, I'm asking the impossible.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yes, because you are evasive.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, I often evade the loaded questions. The ones with
premise which are flawed or outrightly false which to
address requires a change of topic.
They lead to endless clintonian like debates on
the most basic of trivialisms. I evade those
like the plague.

Are the questions "loaded" or do you wish to avoid their implications?

Most are simply loaded with obviously false premises I choose not
to bother with.
If there is something implied, why not just be out with it.
I don't care for beating around the bush.

That's odd because you load questions down with obviously false premises
quite often.

Or to put it the form of a statement so you can't claim you are required
to change the subject, you appear to call questions "loaded" when you
wish to avoid their implications.

You appear to be delusional, but appearances can be deceiving.

Yes, like that.

Stephen
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT:Olbermann on oil/McCain
    ... I often evade the loaded questions. ... Are the questions "loaded" or do you wish to avoid their implications? ... That's odd because you load questions down with obviously false premises ... but appearances can be deceiving. ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: OT:Olbermann on oil/McCain
    ... Clyde Slick wrote: ... I often evade the loaded questions. ... Are the questions "loaded" or do you wish to avoid their implications? ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: OT:Olbermann on oil/McCain
    ... I often evade the loaded questions. ... premise which are flawed or outrightly false which to ... Are the questions "loaded" or do you wish to avoid their implications? ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: OT:Olbermann on oil/McCain
    ... I often evade the loaded questions. ... premise which are flawed or outrightly false which to ... Are the questions "loaded" or do you wish to avoid their implications? ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: OT:Olbermann on oil/McCain
    ... I often evade the loaded questions. ... Are the questions "loaded" or do you wish to avoid their implications? ... I suppose it's good you own up to your evasiveness. ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)