Re: Another obituary for the CD
- From: Bret Ludwig <bretldwig@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:59:19 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 28, 9:46 am, George M. Middius <cmndr _ george @ comcast .
net> wrote:
RapidRonnie said:
That said, I think a person has a right to be a racist, provided he
does not infringe on the rights of members of groups he personally
does not like.
When hateful views are spewed in public, others have a right to disagree.
As long as we don't inflict anything worse on the racist than he inflicts
on us, it's all part of the right to free speech.
What is hate? Who defines it? Why are certain preferences hate and
others, such as found in Mein Tampf or the Talmud or other explicitly
racist works, not hate? When is this decision made? Where are your
criteria derived from?
I want answers.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another obituary for the CD
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: Another obituary for the CD
- References:
- Another obituary for the CD
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: Another obituary for the CD
- From: Bret Ludwig
- Re: Another obituary for the CD
- From: Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
- Re: Another obituary for the CD
- From: Bret Ludwig
- Re: Another obituary for the CD
- From: Clyde Slick
- Re: Another obituary for the CD
- From: RapidRonnie
- Another obituary for the CD
- Prev by Date: Re: Another obituary for the CD
- Next by Date: Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- Previous by thread: Re: Another obituary for the CD
- Next by thread: Re: Another obituary for the CD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|