Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- From: "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:27:43 -0500
"JBorg, Jr." <EddieM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rvAkj.913$so6.573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Arny Krueger wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote
Well yes, Mr. Costich, the test results aren't
scientifically valid but it didn't disproved that the
sound differences heard by participants did not
physically exist.
That was another potential flaw in the tests. I see no
controls that ensured that the listeners heard the
identically same selections of music. Therefore, the
listeners may have heard differences that did physically
exist - unfortunately they were due to random choices by
the experimenter, not audible differences that were
inherent in the cables.
Mr. Costich opined that disproving the sound differences
heard by audiophiles do not physically exist is not in
the realm of statistical analysis.
I read all his posts, and saw no such thing. I did see him correct other
such misrepresentions of what he said.
Basically borglet, you're not a reliable analyst in matters like these.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- From: JBorg, Jr.
- Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- References:
- Blind Cable Test at CES
- From: John Atkinson
- Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- From: vinylanach
- Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- From: Walt
- Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- From: Oliver Costich
- Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- From: JBorg, Jr.
- Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- From: Arny Krueger
- Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- From: JBorg, Jr.
- Blind Cable Test at CES
- Prev by Date: Re: Eastbay vinyl
- Next by Date: Re: Eastbay vinyl
- Previous by thread: Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- Next by thread: Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|