Re: Blind Cable Test at CES

"JBorg, Jr." <EddieM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mJZjj.592$nK5.263@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Well yes, Mr. Costich, the test results aren't
scientifically valid but it didn't disproved that the
sound differences heard by participants did not physically exist.

That was another potential flaw in the tests. I see no controls that ensured
that the listeners heard the indentically same selections of music.
Therefore, the listeners may have heard differences that did physically
exist - unfortunately they were due to random choices by the experimenter,
not audible differences that were inherent in the cables.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
    ... sound differences heard by participants did not physically exist. ... That was another potential flaw in the tests. ... the listeners may have heard differences that did ... Mr. Costich opined that disproving the sound differences heard by ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
    ... sound differences heard by participants did not physically exist. ... That was another potential flaw in the tests. ... the listeners may have heard differences that did ... Mr. Costich opined that disproving the sound differences heard by ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: For the attn. of Mr. Oliver Costich ... re: Preferences and Statiscal Analysis
    ... listeners can tell the better cable more the half the time, ... or discern subtle differences based on sound differences ... or sound preferences during audio testing. ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
    ... controls that ensured that the listeners heard the ... random choices by the experimenter, ... Mr. Costich opined that disproving the sound differences ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: Blind Cable Test at CES
    ... listeners may have heard differences that did physically ... Mr. Costich opined that disproving the sound differences ... the realm of statistical analysis. ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)